2024 CFP Team Rating Profiles (Selection Day)
2025 :: 2024 :: 2023 :: 2022 :: 2021 :: 2020 :: 2019 :: 2018 :: 2017 :: 2016 :: 2015 :: 2014 :: 2013 :: 2012 :: 2011 :: 2010 :: 2009 :: 2008 :: 2007
College Football Playoff (CFP) rankings are produced by the selection committee responsible for assigning teams to the national championship playoff bracket. Teams selected to the 12-team field are asterisked. FEI ratings represent opponent-adjusted per possession scoring efficiency. Strength of record ratings are the difference between actual wins and expected wins against the schedule for an elite team (EWD), a good team (GWD), and an average team (AWD). Record splits include records against FEI top-10 (v10), top-20 (v20), top-30 (v30), top-40 (v40), top-50 (v50), top-60 (v60), and against all other opponents (vO).
CFP | Team | Rec | FBS | FEI | Rk | EWD | Rk | GWD | Rk | AWD | Rk | v10 | v20 | v30 | v40 | v50 | v60 | vO | ||
1 | Oregon* | 13-0 | 12-0 | 1.30 | 2 | 1.57 | 1 | 4.07 | 2 | 7.56 | 1 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 4-0 | 5-0 | 6-0 | 8-0 | 5-0 | ||
2 | Georgia* | 11-2 | 10-2 | 1.04 | 8 | .73 | 2 | 4.34 | 1 | 7.39 | 2 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 5-2 | 6-2 | 8-2 | 8-2 | 3-0 | ||
3 | Texas* | 11-2 | 11-2 | 1.27 | 4 | -.56 | 9 | 2.55 | 3 | 6.59 | 3 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 5-2 | 6-2 | 7-2 | 4-0 | ||
4 | Penn State* | 11-2 | 11-2 | 1.10 | 6 | -.22 | 6 | 2.42 | 4 | 5.98 | 5 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 6-2 | 5-0 | ||
5 | Notre Dame* | 11-1 | 11-1 | 1.28 | 3 | -.05 | 4 | 2.40 | 5 | 6.02 | 4 | - | 3-0 | 4-0 | 5-0 | 6-0 | 6-0 | 5-1 | ||
6 | Ohio State* | 10-2 | 10-2 | 1.50 | 1 | -.20 | 5 | 2.23 | 6 | 5.05 | 10 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 6-0 | ||
7 | Tennessee* | 10-2 | 9-2 | .96 | 10 | -.86 | 10 | 1.63 | 9 | 4.75 | 14 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 4-1 | 5-1 | 5-2 | 5-0 | ||
8 | Indiana* | 11-1 | 10-1 | 1.06 | 7 | .02 | 3 | 1.59 | 10 | 4.40 | 17 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 4-1 | 7-0 | ||
9 | Boise State* | 12-1 | 11-1 | .65 | 22 | -.25 | 7 | .83 | 18 | 3.44 | 26 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 10-0 | ||
10 | SMU* | 11-2 | 10-2 | .87 | 13 | -1.18 | 12 | 1.33 | 11 | 5.32 | 8 | - | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 6-2 | 5-0 | ||
11 | Alabama | 9-3 | 8-3 | 1.02 | 9 | -1.44 | 16 | 1.73 | 8 | 5.26 | 9 | 1-1 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 6-3 | 6-3 | 3-0 | ||
12 | Arizona State* | 11-2 | 11-2 | .82 | 15 | -1.34 | 15 | 1.32 | 12 | 5.87 | 6 | - | 1-0 | 2-0 | 4-0 | 5-1 | 7-2 | 4-0 | ||
13 | Miami | 10-2 | 9-2 | .92 | 11 | -1.31 | 14 | .92 | 17 | 4.43 | 16 | - | 1-0 | 3-0 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 5-2 | 5-0 | ||
14 | Ole Miss | 9-3 | 8-3 | 1.11 | 5 | -1.80 | 20 | .82 | 19 | 4.09 | 19 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 3-3 | 4-3 | 5-0 | ||
15 | South Carolina | 9-3 | 8-3 | .90 | 12 | -1.28 | 13 | 2.03 | 7 | 5.42 | 7 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 5-3 | 6-3 | 6-3 | 3-0 | ||
16 | Clemson* | 10-3 | 9-3 | .81 | 16 | -1.64 | 18 | .95 | 16 | 4.44 | 15 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 7-0 | ||
17 | BYU | 10-2 | 9-2 | .70 | 18 | -1.12 | 11 | 1.29 | 13 | 4.82 | 12 | - | 1-1 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 5-2 | 5-0 | ||
18 | Iowa State | 10-3 | 9-3 | .55 | 29 | -2.17 | 25 | .71 | 23 | 4.93 | 11 | - | 0-1 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 4-3 | 6-3 | 4-0 | ||
19 | Missouri | 9-3 | 8-3 | .52 | 34 | -1.88 | 21 | .76 | 22 | 4.10 | 18 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 4-3 | 5-3 | 4-0 | ||
20 | Illinois | 9-3 | 8-3 | .39 | 38 | -1.48 | 17 | .95 | 15 | 3.79 | 24 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 5-0 | ||
21 | Syracuse | 9-3 | 8-3 | .28 | 48 | -2.34 | 28 | -.01 | 27 | 3.94 | 20 | - | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-0 | 4-1 | 5-2 | 4-1 | ||
22 | Army | 11-1 | 10-1 | .69 | 21 | -.28 | 8 | .40 | 24 | 2.02 | 42 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 10-0 | ||
23 | Colorado | 9-3 | 8-3 | .62 | 25 | -2.44 | 30 | -.11 | 28 | 3.90 | 21 | - | - | 0-1 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 5-3 | 4-0 | ||
24 | UNLV | 10-3 | 9-3 | .34 | 44 | -2.50 | 32 | -1.04 | 39 | 1.99 | 44 | - | - | 0-2 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 9-0 | ||
25 | Memphis | 10-2 | 9-2 | .08 | 61 | -1.78 | 19 | -1.12 | 40 | 1.14 | 53 | - | - | - | 1-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 9-1 |