2022 CFP Team Rating Profiles (Selection Day)
2025 :: 2024 :: 2023 :: 2022 :: 2021 :: 2020 :: 2019 :: 2018 :: 2017 :: 2016 :: 2015 :: 2014 :: 2013 :: 2012 :: 2011 :: 2010 :: 2009 :: 2008 :: 2007
College Football Playoff (CFP) rankings are produced by the selection committee responsible for assigning teams to the national championship playoff bracket. Teams selected to the 4-team field are asterisked. FEI ratings represent opponent-adjusted per possession scoring efficiency. Strength of record ratings are the difference between actual wins and expected wins against the schedule for an elite team (EWD), a good team (GWD), and an average team (AWD). Record splits include records against FEI top-10 (v10), top-20 (v20), top-30 (v30), top-40 (v40), top-50 (v50), top-60 (v60), and against all other opponents (vO).
CFP | Team | Rec | FBS | FEI | Rk | EWD | Rk | GWD | Rk | AWD | Rk | v10 | v20 | v30 | v40 | v50 | v60 | vO | ||
1 | Georgia* | 13-0 | 12-0 | 1.64 | 1 | 1.63 | 1 | 4.84 | 1 | 8.66 | 1 | 1-0 | 4-0 | 5-0 | 8-0 | 9-0 | 9-0 | 4-0 | ||
2 | Michigan* | 13-0 | 13-0 | 1.34 | 3 | 1.33 | 2 | 3.67 | 3 | 7.01 | 3 | 2-0 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 5-0 | 6-0 | 7-0 | 6-0 | ||
3 | TCU* | 12-1 | 11-1 | 1.04 | 7 | .65 | 3 | 3.99 | 2 | 7.83 | 2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 5-1 | 7-1 | 8-1 | 10-1 | 2-0 | ||
4 | Ohio State* | 11-1 | 11-1 | 1.36 | 2 | .28 | 4 | 2.61 | 5 | 6.14 | 5 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 5-1 | 5-1 | 6-1 | 5-0 | ||
5 | Alabama | 10-2 | 9-2 | 1.27 | 4 | -.23 | 6 | 2.65 | 4 | 5.65 | 6 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 4-0 | ||
6 | Tennessee | 10-2 | 9-2 | 1.25 | 5 | -.05 | 5 | 2.51 | 7 | 5.47 | 7 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 5-2 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 4-0 | ||
7 | Clemson | 11-2 | 10-2 | .58 | 21 | -1.30 | 11 | .94 | 13 | 4.74 | 12 | - | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 6-0 | ||
8 | Utah | 10-3 | 9-3 | 1.00 | 9 | -1.88 | 18 | .84 | 14 | 4.40 | 13 | - | 3-1 | 3-3 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 6-0 | ||
9 | Kansas State | 10-3 | 9-3 | 1.04 | 8 | -1.18 | 9 | 2.61 | 6 | 6.80 | 4 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 4-3 | 7-3 | 8-3 | 9-3 | 1-0 | ||
10 | USC | 11-2 | 11-2 | .74 | 14 | -.85 | 8 | 1.73 | 10 | 5.40 | 8 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 5-2 | 6-0 | ||
11 | Penn State | 10-2 | 10-2 | .94 | 10 | -.43 | 7 | 1.81 | 9 | 5.22 | 9 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 4-2 | 5-2 | 5-0 | ||
12 | Washington | 10-2 | 9-2 | .66 | 17 | -1.37 | 12 | .45 | 19 | 3.69 | 18 | - | 2-0 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 4-1 | 6-1 | ||
13 | Florida State | 9-3 | 8-3 | .92 | 11 | -2.32 | 24 | -.13 | 22 | 3.50 | 21 | - | 1-0 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 5-0 | ||
14 | Oregon State | 9-3 | 8-3 | .59 | 20 | -1.90 | 19 | .53 | 17 | 3.73 | 17 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 6-0 | ||
15 | Oregon | 9-3 | 8-3 | .87 | 12 | -1.38 | 13 | .96 | 12 | 4.04 | 15 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 6-0 | ||
16 | Tulane | 11-2 | 10-2 | .57 | 22 | -1.41 | 14 | .55 | 16 | 4.16 | 14 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 7-1 | 4-1 | ||
17 | LSU | 9-4 | 8-4 | .79 | 13 | -1.18 | 10 | 2.15 | 8 | 5.17 | 10 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 6-4 | 6-4 | 3-0 | ||
18 | UCLA | 9-3 | 8-3 | .46 | 30 | -1.97 | 20 | .06 | 20 | 2.89 | 24 | 1-0 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 7-1 | ||
19 | South Carolina | 8-4 | 7-4 | .43 | 36 | -2.11 | 22 | .49 | 18 | 3.56 | 20 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 4-0 | ||
20 | Texas | 8-4 | 8-4 | 1.15 | 6 | -2.27 | 23 | 1.02 | 11 | 4.87 | 11 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 5-4 | 7-4 | 1-0 | ||
21 | Notre Dame | 8-4 | 8-4 | .52 | 26 | -2.98 | 31 | -1.06 | 32 | 2.47 | 29 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 6-2 | ||
22 | Mississippi State | 8-4 | 7-4 | .71 | 15 | -1.99 | 21 | .77 | 15 | 3.98 | 16 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 5-4 | 3-0 | ||
23 | NC State | 8-4 | 7-4 | .20 | 49 | -3.29 | 34 | -1.11 | 35 | 2.40 | 30 | - | 1-0 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 4-3 | 4-1 | ||
24 | Troy | 11-2 | 10-2 | .08 | 60 | -1.72 | 16 | -.78 | 29 | 2.14 | 36 | - | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 11-1 | ||
25 | UTSA | 11-2 | 10-2 | .14 | 53 | -1.44 | 15 | -.62 | 27 | 1.60 | 46 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 11-0 |